Assessment and migration planning
Review workloads, connectivity, identity, data dependencies and operational requirements. Compare practical migration options, sequence the work and identify what needs to change before a workload moves.
Services / 03
Assess your current workloads, establish the foundations and migrate in sensible stages. Bring application dependencies, access, operations and cost into the plan from the beginning.
Typical starting points
What we can scope
Review workloads, connectivity, identity, data dependencies and operational requirements. Compare practical migration options, sequence the work and identify what needs to change before a workload moves.
Define landing zones, access boundaries, network patterns and infrastructure automation. Include environment separation, logging and ownership so that the platform has a clear operating model.
Migrate agreed workloads, engineer container platforms where suitable, and validate application behaviour. Add observability and review resource use against an agreed baseline rather than promising a fixed saving.
Concrete outputs
Azure and AWS, Terraform, ARM/Bicep, Docker and Kubernetes are supported by the supplied capability context. Specific services depend on workload needs and the team selected. Formal cloud partnerships are not implied.
Proposed delivery sequence
A shared delivery plan · 1 / 5
Inventory workloads, risks and business dependencies.
A shared delivery plan · 2 / 5
Establish the target platform and access model.
A shared delivery plan · 3 / 5
Validate an initial workload and rehearse the cutover.
A shared delivery plan · 4 / 5
Move agreed waves with explicit checkpoints.
A shared delivery plan · 5 / 5
Review observability, cost and ownership; hand over.
Common questions
No. Assessment should identify suitable migration candidates and explain when retaining or changing a workload is more sensible. The plan follows business requirements, dependencies and operating constraints.
Availability requirements need a workload-specific design and test plan. We agree acceptable interruption, data consistency checks and rollback conditions before cutover rather than making a blanket availability promise.
Yes. A defined engagement can address infrastructure automation, container platforms, observability or platform consistency without requiring a full migration. We agree a measurable baseline and the limits of the work.
Handover includes operational responsibilities, infrastructure definitions, known exceptions and runbooks. Continuing support or platform improvement can be scoped separately, with service hours and targets agreed explicitly.
A clear next step
Discuss your current hosting, critical workloads and the operational requirements for a controlled migration.